The you recommend to mount them via the hypervisor?
I was certainly planning to use it in the vm itself…
The you recommend to mount them via the hypervisor?
I was certainly planning to use it in the vm itself…
Thanks for the comment, I will try to check but performance should not be an issue. In the end it is personal selfhosted service.
If you think something similar to Instagram could solve your problem, check this: https://docs.pixelfed.org/running-pixelfed/installation/
Also, it should be trivial to expand it to the rest of the family
Super good, it is increíble useful and the ability to find any document in almost any place in seconds in awesome.
Once this is said, you need to stick to a process and it is time consuming, and of course, you need to manually review the automatics tagging feature.
So, It is not a set and forget like most of the people expect
Best answer to your question, try to stick to it
Definitely.
I forgot to add that it would be necessary not to overdimension the set up. Any extra power is something that needs to be powered.
But with the chosen cpu and GPU there is not a lot of room here.
Some tips here:
And that’s all. Sometimes there is a component of trial and error because sometimes the curve performance / power is not entirely linear and you don’t want to hit exponential-non-linear zone.
Good luck and if you can post you build with numbers and some lessons learnt would be great
Good luck
Hi,
Every time it happened to me was either transcoding, either a real poor network speed.
I would double check the transcoding option
Oooops, that was not certainly the intention.
Clearly I need to work in my communication skills. My apologies if I really upset you
From your text I understand you are not a really tech savvy person and yiu are really struggling with all the service and configuration involved.
If you want a simple tip, stick to tailscale, it is a vpn and will protect all your services because you will not have access from internet. It is pretty safe and the configuration is trivial.
The obvious drawback is that you won’t have internet access without installing the vpn, which depending the use case can be a deal breaker.
Honestly, a proper configured nginx with certificates and strong password are reasonable secure when there is not any misconfiguration. But if you are in doubt stick to tailscale.
Good luck :)
Incredible amount of work, respect.
If you are lacking ideas for the super long term I could suggest you:
Any kind of ids/ips (intrusion detection system) Deep inspection packet to detect any vpn or crypto tunnel Ability to create a vpn link to another instance of the program (to link geographical disperse nodes)
And many other things that honestly I am ashamed of asking :)
Truly incredible, shame on the.
Question then.
Are you experimenting some kind of connections problems?
I ask because I know some multiplayer games make a heavy use of the ipv6. Steam have some servers that are not reachable via ipv4, and don’t speak about vps…
Honestly, I cannt believe it.
Double or triple check it. The problem these days is to get a semifucntianl ipv4, they are expensive, scarce and full of problems.
Ipv6 on the contrary is abundant and all enterprise equipment fully support it since decades.
Take wiht a bit (or a lot) of salt what I am gonna say. Because undoubtedly I am. Missing something here.
But if what you a already say is true probably you are not restricting anything. The recommended way to do so is with a firewall rule (probably in your router).
You are extending the subnet definition beyond the 16 bits. This can create problems and I doubt that your router will block anything if something crafted is received from Internet.
But of course, being the extremely big address space your are probably safe.
I any case, with a firewall rule in your router allowing only the proxy to go receive connections, you should be good and more standard conform
This is not the Nat functionality as people associated with ipv4, and certainly it is not showing the drawback of allowing the communication only when the NATed client started the communication.
Even if they are alike they are not the same.
I reaffirm myself here. It is possible to have full ipv6 communication and providers do not have cgnats. It is your easiest and most uncomplicated solution with almost nothing to install to make it work.
And in addition, I have to say that I don’t see any benefit in using such functionality at home. If someone can illustrate me a use case I would be thankful
Ipv6
Cgnats don’t exist in ipv6. Nat doesn’t exist in ipv6
What also could happen is your isp blocking some ports from outside its network as a security approach, but normally you can ask to free a range of port from the firewall.
Something that is usually forgotten is that cgnats are only there for ipv4. Running your server in ipv6 is almost a safe bet to have good connectivity.
And you know, these days getting a real ipv4 is more expensive than running in ipv6
It could also be noise on the line, try introducing a ferromagnetic filter (low pass filter) to see if the situation improves.
Check also that the occurrences are not linked with the activation of an electric motor. I one bought a meat grinder that evertyime was on the analogical radio got only noise. And they even were not connected to the same circuit.
Give kodi a try ;)
Thx, I will keep in mind, but I have consumer grade hw and I am afraid that vlan in my switch is not possible.
I any case thanks for the bunch of tips