Lupec

Yeah, you’re probably right. I didn’t connect the dots that’s what you’d need here, my bad.

Ah, I see. I’ll check it out!

Yeah, I feel that. I’ve settled on telmate’s but there’s a few things I’ve had to implement as hacky post creation SSH edits on the config files, such as passing through the Intel GPU to my Jellyfin container.

I don’t have much actual experience with it but you can run arbitrary shell commands in at least cloud-init, the others should be able to do the same. Maybe that could work? Definitely better than manually running scripts, at least.

It’s not a feature I’ve used myself but I’m pretty sure you can create Jellyfin playlists and collections spanning different libraries, so that could work if you’re okay with some manual curation

I use Proxmox, running a mix of regular and NixOS based LXCs. One of those also runs Docker for simpler services.

Yup, traefik isn’t able to do any sort of serving itself so for anything more complex than a handful of ports you’re expected to use nginx or whatever webserver to serve what you need and then have traefik on top of that as a reverse proxy. Or at least that’s my understanding as a somewhat new user.

There’s a server federation feature request currently marked as planned, so some form of that is probably coming at some point!

I’ve been using Hetzner with borg for a while now and it’s been super solid, can’t be beaten price wise either as far as I’ve looked

That’s fair, it’s my workflow too. I just like the idea of being able to access it from any device in a pinch or from a locked down work computer, for instance.

Right, Syncthing works fine too. It’s not that big a deal since I already use it for other stuff anyway but I’d love to be able to just open a browser from anywhere and point at my Logseq instance without having to install anything.

That’s really cool, I’ve felt for a while that a middle ground between something like yunohost and a manual deployment would be cool and this seems to fit the bill quite nicely

I love Logseq to bits but I wish self hosting it made more sense. Last I checked it still requires you to point it to a local folder even if you host it yourself and access it through the browser so it’s kinda useless.

I deal with it because it’s by far the best fit I’ve found for my workflow but I’m not crazy about having to set up Syncthing and install the app everywhere.

I think they’re saying they don’t have SSH access at all

I’ve been reading into k3s out of curiosity, which as I understand is supposed to be one of the simpler ones, and even as someone who works as a developer and maintains a small homelab, it just makes me feel utterly clueless lol. Which is to say, I’ll definitely be giving Nomad a good look.

Oh and if you do happen to have any other more newbie friendly suggestions, I’d love to hear about them!

It does list that as another possible meaning, if I’m reading the table correctly

Gotta love ISPs. I ended up getting myself a good router on my own and having it piggyback off the ISP provided one so I could actually change settings around. Not ideal but it’s something. As a bonus, my subnet always looks the same and whatnot, a godsend for self-hosting.

Btw, Tailscale raised the free tier limits a while ago and it’s now an even more generous 100 devices/3 users

Right, that’s a bummer. I’m guessing you don’t have enough access to turn off your router’s DHCP server so pihole can take over properly? If that’s the case, I guess you’d have to get another router and make your own subnet off the ISP one or something along those lines so you have more control, that’s kinda what my setup looks like at the moment.

I don’t have a guide at hand but I basically just set a wildcard DNS rewrite on AdGuard Home so that *.my.domain redirects to the IP running my reverse proxy. Since AdGuard is set up at the router level, everything goes through it so the proxy handles everything from there.
I can share specifics after I get home in a few hours if you need a hand, feel free to reach out.