Truenas scale is Debian, if you just use it remotely it may be a good bet. If you may use the server as workstation (e.g. desktop) then you better use Debian itself (or both, as VMs under Proxmox). Managing ZFS is super easy, just create a couple of volumes with small and big blocksize, in either cockpit or whatever web ui. You may also switch OS (e.g. disaster or play around), and recover these effortlessly with zfs import command from CLI. Good luck!

This conflict is positive. Many other reverse proxy software wouldn’t be as “transparent” and the safety would then be false pretend.

The “simpler” just connect the cable and make it work is feasible, https://shallowsky.com/blog/linux/raspberry-pi-ethernet-gadget.html

Rclone.org is poetry then ;)

if IM was your need, check snikket.org although I can’t remember how well they support OTP encryption… of course it’s subjective how many layers one need, I’d be happy with just self-host and TLS, that’s how far I’d go for me and my relatives for day-to-day privacy.

Indeed, ZFS uses a percentage of RAM for cache. That amount is configurable. ZFS has a easier CLI, I’d recommend it for a NAS. And, allow me to say that I am not sure the comparison is between truenas scale and proxmox really. This thread reminds me of the usual distro wars when people don’t know about desktop environments (kde, gnome, xfce, etc.) as in: you can use ZFS in proxmox ;O

Since no one mentioned, there’s a Firefox send fork alive, send.vis.ee or src GitHub.com/timvisee/send

Oh. I didn’t meant to incite breaking any of the golden rules of cyber safety: (1) always update, (2) never host WordPress ;)

Note that this news are important, I only want to give some peace of mind to the many amateurs self-hosting out there ;) Don’t panic. Think about how such attacker might gain access. There’s always a practical difference between a vulnerability being there and how easily it is exploitable. Most CVEs are theoretical, and combining 4 of them would be even more difficult. From what I read, the vulnerability would be in the Dockerfile itself. Also, you need to weigh in the motivation such attacker would have. If you’re an average netizen is different from a multi billion dollar company website. So, the attacker would need to meet all those conditions described in the CVEs and even in that case, they might escape the container only to find it was installed in rootless mode, so they just have access as regular user. But that’s depending on how docker was installed.

You can compare prices (and locations) of “dedi(s)” here https://lowendbox.com/category/virtual-servers/

I used Czkawka and Picard in the past. They were great and robust solutions. They are not web apps tho.

You will also be interested into https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Web_feed#Obtaining_web_feeds

Everyone is suggesting readers. I think you are looking for something like https://docs.rsshub.app it’s capable of generating RSS feeds from pretty much everything.

And some also sync with TMDB ;)

It would be great if we could have a YAML config within the settings for all custom (or not) redirects. And if such lists were synced from some repo and then only locally sorted or trimmed by …ping, for example. Something like:

• source site RegEx to match:
  • redirect to this instance
  • or here’s another one, maybe even with a different alternative frontend.

TLD is .computer, there’s a typo

Apache Guacamole comes to mind, it gives you access to all desktop apps on a headless server. Granted, you may not want to install desktop apps. But I think it’s smart to offload development of, say, music players to other projects instead of reinventing each and every wheel… (Also, there’s music streaming and all sort of web apps already. So I don’t know what’s the usecase really. But that’s just me tho)

Edit: kudos on your project. Looks neat!!!

Uptime Kuma maybe

There’s this list which might be of your interest https://codeberg.org/jonatasbaldin/delightful-sustainable-vps

Rather use a smaller app, like FileBrowser