thank you for the reply. All the stuff you wrote makes sense.
But even if I obtain a LetsEncrypt cert, any LAN device can do the same thing, so the whole TLS can still be MITM-ed.
can you elaborate?
thank you for the reply. All the stuff you wrote makes sense.
But even if I obtain a LetsEncrypt cert, any LAN device can do the same thing, so the whole TLS can still be MITM-ed.
can you elaborate?
Very interesting project, thanks for sharing and working on this. I am actually one of your target user, where I have enough knowledge to implement my own router, at the moment running on gentoo.
I would like to use this but it lacks port forwarding and a firewall, that is a must. I’ll try it out nevertheless. I’m quite impressed by the stylish HTML graphics, and I appreciate your departure from the typical “modern” gray corporate Bootstrap UI design. It’s really, really cool.
One question. how do you envision exposing this service to the internet? I quite despise rust but I wonder if the use of a memory safe language would help with the inevitable bugs, especially if you put even more features into gatekeeper.
you are literally just posting buzzwords. You can be lean with mysql, you can write bloaty programs with rust. I would argue most rust webservices are shittier than java ones
My point: if you’re getting started selfhosting you have to embrace and accept the self-inflicted punishment. Good luck everybody, I don’t know if I can keep choosing to get disappointed.
I would say that your self inflicted punishment is using windows. Switch to debian and thank me in six months
I am using vikunja for the same thing
Guys, downvotes are not the DISLIKE button, let’s not become reddit please
Not only it can be done but I think it is the way to go. You then have to manage permissions and backup only on one database, and the performance improves given that you let postgresql manage it’s own IO. It goes without saying that you should use postgresql instead of mysql
interesting. This could all be solved if gatekeeper doesn’t allow port redirection on 80 unless explicitly configured by the administrator, right?