Really cool. Anyone know if screenshot + pdf is as good as what raindrop does to archive saved sites? Is it possible to use archive.org or something similar in place or in addition to the builtin archiving?

So it is! Damn I’ll definitely be using this then. At least until they decide to close the gates and force you into a subscription again. For now though, I’d say it’s the best option. But don’t be surprised when they enshittification continues

It’s in a really unfortunate state. FOSS wise, the only thing I can recommend is navidrome, BUT finding a good app for it is REALLY hard.

One step away from that would be plex pass, which is getting enshittified more and more and will likely never reverse course. But if you just want a good self hosted music player, plex pass is much better than navidrome, to the point where you have to be REALLY dedicated to decide on a navidrome solution over plex amp.

Then there’s Roon, which is as far as you can get from a FOSS solution but is unfortunately the best solution to self hosting and streaming combined, and it has an awesome interface where you can read bios of the artists, select a composition of theirs, view any documented covers or interpretations of it, find out everyone who played on a particular song and what they played, then check out their entire range of output, and so on. There’s unfortunately nothing close to Roon for that experience , but Roon still has MAJOR faults and bugs.

So you get nothing and you’ll have to make do with that :\

BTW I’d be stoked to work on a project that aims to make a FOSS version of Roon. I just want to see those fuckers suffer the way I’ve suffered dealing with that horrible program

It could also be your router/firewall/server combo.

Someone installed chimera os already! Should be in YouTube search results

I do think they’ll release an amd version

Hmm that’s a good point. Though I think it shouldn’t be too bad unless under heavy load all the time. I think the CPU is made for laptops. That said it’d definitely have to be doing more than just working as an opnsense box

Also for media creation, using my main pc and nvme as a staging area and moving finished work and archived projects to my NAS is really helped along by the 10g connection I have. Easily saturates it with 6x7200rpm exos drives.

I updated it.

Great info thanks. Definitely agree, it’d be worth it for the lower power draw and lower heat output.

I’m a beginner homelabber with just a NAS and a repurposed alienware laptop. I’d be able to offload all containers I’m running onto the ms-01. Also 4k video can be really hard on the CPU so even if it’s overkill for just 4k video, that headroom is of course helpful, especially if you’re running multiple containers, or even if you have two or more people in the household streaming simultaneously

I use 10g between my main pc and my nas. It’s amazing. I use nvmes for triple a, intensive type games, and almost everything else gets installed on the nas. There’s great use cases for 10g.

the pci slot would be able to be used for external storage, like connecting to a nas or das. serve the home found you can add one of these though I don’t think they tested that it can hit the max theoretical throughput of 96gbps.

Much prefer Logseq as well.

Hi all, I created the !pkms@sh.itjust.works community for this exact reason.

Ahh interesting. So do you have to manually set an upstream dns server?

I think it does caching because grimd does caching. I want a dns filter and dns resolver that’s selfhosted but still performant and low latency. Caching of course is big part of that because if you’re running recursive queries every time, your ping will be like 100-200ms.

I’m basically just wondering if I can replace my blocky+unbound setup with just leng!

Does this just use an upstream dns server or can it do recursive resolution like unbound? Does it cache results?

Spam bro, you’re spamming so much random garbage. What the hell

That’s a great question. Sounds like iscsi is less flexible but more performant, but potentially only in particular situations you may not encounter in a homelab, while nfs is more flexible and not as performant, depending on what you use.

From what I’ve learned just reading this thread, you should make iscsi for db and vms, and nfs for stuff like linux isos and other shared media. That said, with iscsi, I believe it’s possible to resize the disk pretty easily. For the DB, you can probably have it be its own little container with an iscsi drive, and expose it over tcp for applications that need access.

As for your last question about worpress, you could archive it before transfer and either store as an archive or extract it after it reaches its destination. Would be a simple script.

That’s cool, so why would someone run pihole/adguard/blocky with unbound?