Yeah, and it’s so comprehensive.
yarn install
yarn dev
My point stands.
Yeah, and it’s so comprehensive.
yarn install
yarn dev
My point stands.
If you really want to serve the self-hosting community, please improve your documentation. As someone unfamiliar with this product, I have no idea what to do with this once I clone the repo. I hunted and found a compose.yaml file, but it’s not clear if this is all I need.
Per rule #3, this seems to be a general home computing question and not centered around self-hosting. Please consider adding details to clarify how this involves self-hosting.
Except when the ONLY pi-hole is down, which was the original OP’s whole question.
Yes, your experience will be different if your DNS is being provided by another kind of DNS resolver. If you want a consistent pi-hole experience (and you can’t avoid downtime of your current pi-hole), add another pi-hole to your network and let that be your secondary DNS resolver.
Add another DNS server (1.1.1.1, for instance) to your DHCP options. Your DHCP clients will use 1.1.1.1 when the pi-hole isn’t responsive.
VLANs all the way. I have several VLANs, including:
EDIT: An alternative would be to replace or supplement Proxmox with Docker/Podman on the bare metal of the server. The container networking would be isolated by default. If you can replace your VM needs with containers, that may get you what you want.
When you mention Postgres, are you saying PG specifically is better, or are you implying that the default SQLite db is what really slows things down? I ask because I’m on mariadb with no complaints, but might switch if NC is faster on Postgres.
I’ll consider it a drop-in replacement when Kubernetes can use it.
Locking the thread. Information relevant to self-hosters has already been shared. Too many reports of off-topic comments to leave this open.
Add “-vvv” to your mount command and see what else it tells you.
Based on the vaultwarden wiki, the default DB engine is SQLite. Therefore, all the data is in the sqlite file(s) contained in your data volume. This backup utility seems to take that into account and only focuses on the data volume.
It’s a stub and almost worthless.