It can show Markdown and have preview of markdown.

It have highlighting of Markdown, but is not editor similar to Sync for lemmy.

Privat gitea server.

Vaultwarden is a lightweight server of bitwarden.

Alternative implementation of the Bitwarden server API written in Rust and compatible with upstream Bitwarden clients*, perfect for self-hosted deployment where running the official resource-heavy service might not be ideal.

GitHub vaultwarden

Server side is more complex. So for serverside you will be hard to find non docker og non manual installasion.

Bitwarden have deb and rpm support.

BTRFS is currently not Journaling

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20220513113826.GV18596@twin.jikos.cz/T/#m46f1e018485e6cb2ed42602defee5963ed8c2789

Qu Wenruo did a write up on some of the edge cases. Partial write being one of them.

I run BTRFS my self.

And I agree BTRFS , is superior.

Yes both BTRFS and Ext4 are vulnerable to unplanned powerloss when writes are in flight. Commonly knows as a write hole.

For BTRFS since it use of Copy of Write, it is more vulnerable. As metadata needs to be updated and more. Ext4 does not have CoW.

This will also happen to Ext4. You just wouldn’t know it.

I do it via dnsmasq, that Pi uses.

I have a ansible playbook, that i use to sync my Piholes.

Then i would go for Seagate Exos X20 https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/seagate-ironwolf-pro-20tb/2

If noise was a concern, they are noticeable quieter. WD Red Pro 22TB Hard Drive, NASCompares

I purchase some Seagate HDD, but was left with the feeling that I regretted buying them. as they are quite noisy.

I would go for WD red, when I get new HDD.

You arguments looks incorrect, -c:v h264_qsv and -c:v hevc_qsv .

I can be a driver issue, you can try with a Live disk to see if the issue persist.

Have you trid outside of Docker?

https://nelsonslog.wordpress.com/2022/08/22/ffmpeg-and-hevc_qsv-intel-quick-sync-settings/ https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Hardware/QuickSync

I understand the use case.

I stand by it is easy to get right, if optic is changing for the difference use cases.

QSPF is not build to be hotplug in that manner.

Correct, they are different physical connectors. But they are interoperable, if the switch support it.

There is QSPF breakout to 4x SFP. There is 40G QSFP+ to 10G SFP+ Adapter Converter Module

No the 10LR have a to wide of a bandwidth, so it will interference the other channels.

If the switch support QSPF breakout, a CWDM-10LR may work.

but it cheaper to by

• https://www.fs.com/de-en/products/72588.html
• 2x https://www.fs.com/de-en/products/72588.html

Then to by 1 CWDM 10G.

Reading a book. 😊